Sponsored by

The New Resource Axis
Theme stock rankings
  Total Fundamental Valuation Sentiment Catalysts Technical Signal  
TTE.PA
 
 
 
 
 
 
?
 
CVX
 
 
 
 
 
 
?
 
CCJ
 
 
 
 
 
 
?
 
GLEN.L
 
 
 
 
 
 
?
 
WDS
 
 
 
 
 
 
?
 
CNQ
 
 
 
 
 
 
?
 
SHEL.L
 
 
 
 
 
 
?
 
XOM
 
 
 
 
 
 
?
 
BHP
 
 
 
 
 
 
?
 
Orion Expands into Australia, Canada, and Singapore
Adding 400+ high-liquidity stocks to our global coverage.
Theme Overview
The “New Resource Axis” theme is entering a strong and accelerating phase, marked not just by tightening supply, but by a concentration of control. Global resource markets are no longer broadly distributed systems; they are increasingly anchored by a small group of dominant producers and operators who sit at the intersection of scale, geography, and capital discipline. The ongoing disruption in the Middle East has exposed the fragility of legacy supply routes, while a decade of underinvestment has removed the industry’s ability to respond elastically. In this environment, supply is not simply constrained—it is strategically held, and pricing is no longer purely market-driven but increasingly shaped by those with access to resilient reserves and infrastructure. This dynamic defines a new resource axis, where control over critical energy and materials is consolidating among a handful of global majors, effectively shifting the balance of power from markets to producers.
Macro drivers
1. Geopolitical Instability: The Middle East conflict and rising risks to key transit routes like the Strait of Hormuz directly disrupt energy supply, creating immediate shortages and heightened risk premiums. This drives a fundamental shift towards energy security.
2. Years of Underinvestment & Capital Discipline: A decade of reduced upstream capital expenditure across the industry, driven by ESG mandates and a focus on shareholder returns, has limited the ability to quickly respond to supply shocks, creating a structurally tight market.
3. Energy Security & Supply Resilience: Governments are prioritizing secure resource bases in stable jurisdictions (e.g., Australia, Canada, US) over purely cost-driven sourcing, amplifying the strategic importance of producers in these regions.
4. Demand for Future-Facing Commodities: Beyond traditional energy, the theme extends to broader commodity chains, including inputs for the energy transition (e.g., copper, uranium) and petrochemicals, reinforcing the strategic importance of resource control. The burgeoning demand for baseload power for AI data centers is a new, powerful driver for nuclear energy, directly benefiting uranium producers.
5. Inflationary Pressures: Supply disruptions and higher energy costs feed into broader commodity chains, contributing to cost pressures across the global economy and highlighting the critical role of resource control.
Cycle positioning
The theme is in an accelerating phase. It has emerged from a period of consolidating (due to underinvestment and ESG pressures) and is now rapidly accelerating due to acute geopolitical shocks and recognition of structural supply deficits. The shift toward secure resource bases represents a long-term structural change, indicating sustained momentum beyond immediate shocks.
Fundamentals / Capital / Catalysts
Fundamentals: The leading companies within this theme exhibit robust fundamentals, including strong operational performance, disciplined capital allocation, and significant free cash flow generation. Many are projecting substantial production growth into 2030, particularly from advantaged upstream portfolios (Permian, Guyana) and strategic projects (LNG, nuclear). There's a clear focus on structural cost reductions and substantial shareholder returns (dividends, buybacks).
Capital flows: Capital is increasingly flowing towards producers with resilient supply chains and those expanding into energy transition materials (copper, uranium) and low-carbon solutions, reflecting strategic investment in energy security and future demand. Acquisitions (e.g., Chevron's Hess deal) and strategic partnerships underscore this trend.
Catalysts: Major catalysts include ongoing geopolitical tensions driving higher commodity prices (oil, gas), new project startups (LNG Canada Phase 2, Golden Pass LNG, Scarborough LNG), strategic acquisitions and asset monetizations, and the accelerating global nuclear renaissance (driven by energy security and AI demand). Downside risks include commodity price volatility, regulatory uncertainties (windfall taxes), and operational disruptions.
A quick message from today’s partner:

SaaS Billing Is Breaking. Here's How to Fix It.

Usage-based pricing is the new default — but most billing platforms weren't built for it. Get the Tabs Buyer's Guide to learn what modern revenue infrastructure actually requires.

TotalEnergies SE
TTE.PA
Fundamental Analysis
TotalEnergies demonstrates a robust fundamental profile, anchored by a strong long-term growth strategy in Exploration & Production (E&P) and Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), driving peer-leading Free Cash Flow (FCF) growth. The Integrated Power business is emerging as a significant growth platform, projected to become FCF positive by 2026, benefiting from strategic acquisitions like EPH and data center demand. Management exudes high confidence, particularly in future production increases and financial resilience at conservative commodity price assumptions. The company maintains a strong balance sheet and attractive shareholder returns, including a flexible buyback program. However, recent quarterly and annual financial reports for 2025 showed declines in net income and EPS, alongside increasing non-current financial debt. Operational challenges include significant Middle East production disruptions (15% offline) and project delays in Tilenga and Nigeria. The petrochemicals segment faces structural issues due to Chinese overcapacity, and the company's reassessment of its 2050 net-zero plans poses potential ESG reputational risks.
Chevron Corp
CVX
Fundamental Analysis
Chevron Corporation is an integrated energy company with a strong and diversified upstream portfolio, notably in Guyana, the Permian Basin, Kazakhstan (Tengiz), and the Gulf of America. The Hess acquisition is expected to significantly enhance its asset base and drive future growth. Management projects 7-10% year-over-year production growth in 2026 and targets over 10% average annual adjusted free cash flow growth through 2030, supported by disciplined capital allocation and ambitious structural cost reductions ($3-$4 billion by YE2026). The company is committed to strong shareholder returns through a growing dividend and significant share repurchases ($10-$20 billion annually through 2030). Proved reserves increased by 8% in 2025 with a 158% replacement ratio. However, net income saw a decline in 2025 compared to previous years, and the 'Earnings Quality' score is low (0.9) relative to peers. Total debt increased in 2025, partly due to the Hess acquisition. The company also faces litigation risks, including a $744.6 million jury verdict in the Rozel case.
Cameco Corp
CCJ
Fundamental Analysis
Cameco delivered exceptionally strong FY2025 results, with net profit surging 243% to $590M and revenue growing 11%. All segments contributed positively, with Westinghouse notably swinging from a net loss to a $58M profit and increasing adjusted EBITDA by 61%. The balance sheet is robust with $1.2B cash and low debt. Management exhibits high confidence in the long-term outlook for the nuclear industry, driven by strong demand fundamentals and a disciplined strategy to maximize value, including holding uncommitted uranium volumes for future price appreciation. However, subtle concerns include a slower-than-design McArthur River production pace due to technical issues, expected lumpiness in Westinghouse's quarterly results, and 2026 guidance projecting a 7% decline in consolidated revenue (though with higher average realized uranium prices).
Before we continue, a quick message from today's partner:

Your Boss Will Think You’re an Ecom Genius

Optimizing for growth? Go-to-Millions is Ari Murray’s ecommerce newsletter packed with proven tactics, creative that converts, and real operator insights—from product strategy to paid media. No mushy strategy. Just what’s working. Subscribe free for weekly ideas that drive revenue.

Glencore PLC
GLEN.L
Fundamental Analysis
Glencore delivered a mixed performance in FY25, with adjusted EBITDA decreasing by 6% year-on-year, though the second half showed significant improvement. Net income turned positive after a 2024 loss. The company is strategically positioned for copper growth, targeting 1.6 million tonnes by 2035, supported by key acquisitions like Quechua and the KCC land access package. Its marketing division remains stable, and management expresses high confidence in operational execution and a strong balance sheet, capable of significant shareholder returns. However, red flags include persistent high debt levels (Net debt at $11.2 billion, Net debt to Adjusted EBITDA 0.83x, with some external reports citing higher debt-to-equity ratios), impairments on coal assets (Cerrejón, South Africa), and management's subtle acknowledgment of execution risk for greenfield projects like Pachón. Strategic asset monetization (DRC, Kazzinc, Bunge stake) provides avenues for capital recycling but introduces deal uncertainty.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
WDS
Fundamental Analysis
Woodside Energy Group Ltd exhibits a mixed fundamental picture. FY2025 saw record production and a significant 745% increase in free cash flow, alongside reduced unit production costs and high operational reliability. Strategic projects like Scarborough, Louisiana LNG, and Trion are progressing, supported by key partnerships (Stonepeak, Williams, JERA) and strong management confidence. However, the company experienced a decline in underlying NPAT (-8%) and NPAT (-24%) in 2025. Significant headwinds include a soft CY26 production guidance (8% YOY decline) due to Pluto LNG downtime, higher-than-expected CY26 capex, and delays in lower-carbon ammonia production. Operational disruptions from Tropical Cyclone Narelle at the Karratha plant further compound near-term challenges. Management acknowledges natural field decline in oil assets and slower-than-expected market uptake for lower-carbon ammonia. Furthermore, the Louisiana LNG project carries elevated execution risk and a lack of clear valuation visibility. While the balance sheet remains strong with good liquidity, these factors present a cautious outlook for near-term financials and execution.
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd
CNQ
Fundamental Analysis
Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ) demonstrated a very strong operational year in 2025, marked by record annual production of 1.571 million BOE/day and record quarterly production of 1.659 million BOE/day, coupled with industry-leading low operating costs across its segments. Net earnings and revenue saw significant year-over-year increases, substantially influenced by a $5,069 million gain on acquisitions, disposition, and remeasurement. The company's balance sheet is robust, with a strong debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 0.9x and healthy interest coverage ratios (16.9x net earnings, 21.8x adjusted funds flow). CNQ has a proven track record of increasing its dividend (26 consecutive years) and has enhanced its free cash flow allocation policy to accelerate shareholder returns. Strategic acquisitions, such as the Peace River assets and full ownership of the Athabasca Oil Sands Project (AOSP) mines, are expected to drive further production growth and operational synergies. A key red flag discussed by management is the deferral of the $8.25 billion Jackpine mine expansion opportunity due to government regulatory uncertainty around carbon pricing and methane regulations, which impacts long-term growth investment. Additionally, non-cash recoverability charges were recognized related to North Sea and Offshore Africa assets, and the Canadian natural gas market continues to face oversupply issues.
Before we continue, a quick message from today's partner:

The free newsletter making HR less lonely

The best HR advice comes from those in the trenches. That’s what this is: real-world HR insights delivered in a newsletter from Hebba Youssef, a Chief People Officer who’s been there. Practical, real strategies with a dash of humor. Because HR shouldn’t be thankless—and you shouldn’t be alone in it.

Shell PLC
SHEL.L
Fundamental Analysis
Shell exhibits robust financial health with strong cash flow from operating activities ($42.9B in 2025) and free cash flow ($26.1B). Management has demonstrated strong capital discipline, delivering $5.1B in structural cost reductions ahead of target and maintaining a strong balance sheet with gearing at 20.7%. The company's strategic focus on Integrated Gas and Upstream is yielding results, with LNG sales growing by 11% in 2025 and a clear pathway for production growth through 2030. Shareholder distributions remain a priority, with $22.4B returned in 2025 (52% of CFFO). However, the Chemicals segment continues to underperform and requires significant repositioning, while the long-term resource sustainability beyond 2030 needs addressing. The year-long outage at the Pearl GTL facility is a notable operational setback impacting short-term earnings and cash flow, as highlighted in recent reports.
Exxon Mobil Corp
XOM
Fundamental Analysis
Exxon Mobil demonstrates strong operational momentum with its advantaged Upstream portfolio, particularly in the Permian Basin and Guyana, which are driving significant production growth and are projected to contribute substantially to earnings and cash flow growth by 2030. The company maintains a resilient balance sheet, actively pursues structural cost reductions, and is committed to significant shareholder returns, including $20 billion in annual buybacks through 2026. Management exhibits exceptionally high confidence in its technology-driven transformation and industry-leading performance. Key wins include timely project deliveries, successful scaling of new technologies like Proxxima Systems, and aggressive expansion initiatives in Alaska, Guyana, and exploring opportunities in Venezuela and Turkey. However, the FY2025 net profit and EPS declined by 14% and 15% respectively, and the severe, long-term damage to Qatar's LNG facilities (where XOM holds significant stakes) represents a substantial operational and financial setback, expected to impact revenue for 3-5 years. Some subsidiaries also showed underperformance, and regulatory scrutiny in Australia poses a minor risk.
BHP Group Ltd
BHP
Fundamental Analysis
BHP Group exhibits a robust fundamental profile, highlighted by strong H1 FY2026 operational and financial performance, with revenue up 10.8% and net profit up 27.7% year-over-year. Management expressed high confidence, describing it as 'another good half both operationally and financially' with 'strong performance on production delivery and cost control.' The company is strategically focused on 'stability plus growth equals value,' particularly in copper, where it's positioned as the world's largest producer with a clear pipeline (Escondida, Vicuña) offering 40% production growth by 2035. The iron ore business remains a world-class, cash-generative asset. However, a significant red flag is the repeated capex increases for the Jansen Potash Stage 1 project, now at US$8.4 billion, raising concerns about project execution, cost visibility, and governance, which management acknowledged needs bolstering. Other risks include 'draconian' royalty approaches in Queensland impacting steelmaking coal, persistent geotechnical challenges, and increasing competitive pressures in iron ore. Despite these, the balance sheet remains strong, supporting a 46% interim dividend increase and expected free cash flow of around US$60 billion over five years.
Discover Orion Insights
Access unbiased, professional equity research covering thousands of high-liquidity stocks across the globe — free to explore.
👉 Explore Orion Insights →

Keep Reading